What Makes A Family?
Thoughts on
Louise Allen's novel
"Virgin Slave, Barbarian King"
Louise Allen's novel
"Virgin Slave, Barbarian King"
This is a bit of a departure for me, as usually my writings on this blog extrapolate spiritual truths (or some vague approximation thereof) from analysis of a sacred text (i.e., the Bible). However, my blog rubric does promise “sermons and other writings”—so here is the exception that proves the rule, my observations and comments (nothing so formal as a review) on Louise Allen’s recent book for Harlequin Historicals, Virgin Slave, Barbarian King.
In general, though it's off my well-beaten historical romance track (I generally prefer 18th and 19th century-set historicals), I enjoyed this novel. Set in 410 AD with the sack of Rome as its backdrop, the book tells the story of Julia (a Roman senator’s daughter), who is abducted by Wulfric (a Visigoth leader). As Julia lives in the midst of Visigoth society, she comes to appreciate Visigoth ideals, falls in love with Wulfric, and embraces a future with him. As Wulfric assimilates Julia into his household and his life, he in turn undertakes a journey of self-discovery, falls in love with Julia, and embraces a different vision of the future than he has heretofore imagined for himself.
Despite the dreadful title that conjures up salacious images of bondage and submission, the book contains relatively little sex, instead focusing on the themes of honor and freedom, the growing emotional and physical interdependence of Julia and Wulfric, and their mutual journey of sacrifice and commitment. (I find it particularly curious that, by the novel’s end, Julia is neither Slave nor Virgin, and Wulfric is neither Barbarian nor King! Perhaps it should be called "Virgin Slave, Barbarian King, Not Really" ?)
Many folks in the blogosphere have analyzed and reviewed this novel, and made, as my English professor Richard Johnson would have put it, “shrewd and felicitous points.” So instead of reiterating what has already been said, I will confine my comments to a theme in the novel, not yet dealt with elsewhere, which I found particularly intriguing: author Allen’s exploration of what it means to be a family.
The notion of family, as Allen presents it in the novel, is a central value of Visigoth life and serves as the primary organizing principle of their community. The author makes this theme plain early on: at the novel’s beginning, when Wulfric saves Julia from being raped by her fellow Romans, he is shocked that she does not know the name of the slave who has accompanied her into danger: “But she was one of your family . . .your responsibility” (pp. 11, 12). Julia is puzzled by this: “She was one of the household. . .a slave,” she replies, attributing their different views to difficulties of language, “the niceties” of Latin (p. 12).
Author Allen makes it clear from this interchange that the Visigoth idea of family is different from the Roman concept, and goes on throughout the novel to explore this difference in a variety of scenes and verbal exchanges. This conversation between Una and Julia makes the question of family explicit:
“’Have you seen a slave being mistreated while you have been among us?’ (Una asks Julia).
‘I have seen no slaves. . . ‘ (Julia replies).
‘That is because you cannot tell the difference by looking. Slaves belong to families, are part of families. . .’ Now (Julia) began to understand. Once you were in a barbarian household, however you got there, everyone had a responsibility towards you, just as you had duties to them” (p. 102).
Later on, after Julia and Wulfric’s first sexual encounter, Julia realizes that “. . . It was days since she had thought of escape, but it was not apathetic resignation or fear that was keeping her here. It was, she realized, a sense of belonging” (p. 135)—something Julia has not experienced in her Roman home, but is finding instead in the Visigoth camp.
For the Visigoths, the concept of family is inclusive, not exclusive—a family includes all members of the household, men and women, slaves and children, whether related by blood or not, who “belong.” “This is a people, a nation. . .and now you are part of it,” Wulfric tells Julia (p. 28), to which Berig adds: “. . . you will be quite at home here” (p. 29).
Being “family” requires interdependence, responsibility and accountability between all members of the household or “kin group.” This mutual obligation is expressed in communal living, distribution of responsibilities among family members, and in vigorous mutual defense. Allen’s description of Julia’s Roman family life, and her comparison of this to Julia’s experience as a member of a Visigoth household, makes this vision of family an unmistakable feature of the novel.
“Involved In Something Momentous”: A Sense of Purpose
Julia’s rapid integration into the Visigoth community illuminates another feature of Visigoth family life as Allen imagines it: the notion that, in an interdependent environment where each person’s work is necessary and each person’s contribution valued, each member of the family is strengthened and inspired by a sense of meaning and purpose.
As Julia begins her first night as a captive in Wulfric’s tent, she readies herself for sleep by removing her tunic and sandals, washing her feet, and preparing the bed, activities which Allen describes as “unfamiliar work” (p. 44) to her as a Roman senator’s daughter. At Julia’s Roman home, we are told, a slave would prepare all this for her, unpin her hair, assist her with face cream, and leave out flowers: “It would all be perfect. Cool, tasteful, perfect” (p. 45).
As part of her duties, Julia must learn “. . .how to wash clothes, how to turn up a tunic and how to deal with a rabbit for the pot” (p. 88). She is also called upon to stitch up Wulfric’s arm when he is wounded in a fight, to pack up Wulfric’s tent when the community takes to the road, and to drive the heavily loaded wagon. And as Julia develops more expertise in these tasks, she comes to see that she is no longer “ . . .clumsy and helpless and ashamed of her pampered, heedless existence” (p. 88), no longer “. . . a gaming piece on the board where family and civic status were decided” (p. 103).
Instead, Julia begins to see herself as useful, resourceful, and an integral part not only of Wulfric’s household but of the Visigoth people as well. She begins to think of herself not as a powerless pawn, but as a person of value, and purpose, and self-determined life.
“I have come to enjoy the way we live now,” Julia tells Wulfric. “I am a slave and yet this seems like freedom. I like the people in my life now, I feel well and fit, I am involved in something momentous” (p. 146). By finding a sense of meaning and purpose, Julia has come to see herself as an important part of the Visigoth family.
Not “Lonely All the Time”: Community and Consistency
In Virgin Slave, Barbarian King, members of the Visigoth community live in a mobile camp, constantly on the move in search of land and in service to their king. Their “homes” consist of tents, wagons, and fireplaces, humans and animals crowded close together, with little or no privacy in which to isolate oneself or hide from others.
On her first evening in the camp, Julia makes note of this: “Outside she could hear the murmur of conversation, could make out Wulfric’s voice amidst a number of other men. . .Further away a baby cried and was hushed, dogs barked, someone came past on a horse, its feet slow and tired sounding” (p. 45). Later, after she and Wulfric have had an argument, Julia wonders: “Wulfric’s voice raised in a roar would not have been stopped by canvas walls. How much had their neighbours heard?” (p. 72).
Julia notes how children and women are part of the community’s activity, helping one another in daily activities and chores, and mentions several times her surprise that Wulfric would interact so naturally and playfully with children of the camp when she cannot “imagine any of the senators of her acquaintance stopping to talk to a grubby child” (p. 29).
Julia contrasts the sound, energy, and mutual involvement of the Visigoth community with memories of her Roman home, where “From outside there would be nothing to hear. Slaves padded silently, all too aware that to be heard was to arouse the wrath of the mistress of the house. . . The house was as tranquil, and as lonely, as the grave (p. 45).” Julia “had felt lonely all the time at home. Here (at the Visigoth camp), she had never felt that sense of distance, the chill of her parents’ house” (p. 102-103).
There is more to this contrast between Visigoth community and Roman isolation, and it relates to another of the novel’s themes, that of personal and political honor.
In the Visigoth camp, little can be hidden from others, and honor is seen as truthfulness and consistency whether in public or in private. Julia tells Wulfric: “For you and your people, I do not think there is that separation—you are the same at your own hearth and in the king’s Council, making love or making war” (p. 145-146). Julia also describes the Roman sense of honor as she understands it: “’It does not matter what a man is behind closed doors—he can beat his wife, fornicate with his slaves, create elaborate schemes to make himself rich at the expense of his neighbours—so long as his public face is correct. . .’ (p. 145).
The ability to be “behind closed doors,” to have a public and a private face within the political sphere and even within the family unit itself, is impossible in the Visigoth camp; the “inconsistency” (as the Visigoths see it) that characterizes the Roman sense of honor rises out of the silence, the privacy, and the isolation of the mansions and corridors of life in Rome.
Julia's growing consciousness of the importance of involvement in community life, authenticity, and accountability to one another give her, and us, insight into Allen's vision of Visigoth family life--a family life that, in one experience after another, dispels Julia's Roman expectations and prejudices and draws her into the Visigoth circle.
A ‘Bristling Wall of Iron’: Vigorous Mutual Defense
Allen’s portrayal of vigorous mutual defense as a defining feature of Visigoth family life is particularly striking. Julia’s Roman family is wealthy, privileged, and secure—and yet, as the novel begins, Julia is on the street and vulnerable to attack during the sack of Rome because her mother, instead of keeping her inside and sheltered, has sent her out of the safety of their home “on this insane errand . . .” (p.8)
Julia muses, “I just did as I was told while she stayed behind the high walls, directing the family treasures to be buried beneath the paving slabs in the peristyle. Mother always knows what her priorities are” (p. 11). Obviously the “family treasures” to be secured and kept safe in this time of danger do not include Julia.
Furthermore, Julia’s family is unconcerned about any trauma or pain she might have experienced as a result of her time with the Visigoths, instead expressing dismay that her loss of virginity has diminished her value as a commodity—a commodity to be used by her family to improve their status and position in society (pp. 274-277).
It is also worth noting that even as Julia’s parents fret about her diminished value, Julia’s father makes it plain that she is far from the most valuable commodity possessed by the family: “Between my banker’s secure vaults and your mother’s skill in hiding the household silver, we lost nothing,” he says (p. 276). Clearly the importance of losing Julia herself for many months pales in comparison!
On the other hand, vigorous defense of family members is seen as an expectation of Visigoth community life, and is not an activity confined to men or warriors. When the Visigoth family caravans are attacked, Allen describes the women as active participants in the defense of their men and their wagons, hauling their children to safety, forming a defensive line, and “lifting the long boar spears and turning to confront the cavalry with a bristling wall of iron” (p. 264).
Wulfric defends Julia at their first meeting by killing her would-be rapists, protecting her more immediately and definitively than her Roman family has; Berig protects and defends Wulfric in various challenges and dangerous situations; and Julia herself takes up a knife in Wulfric’s defense after his confrontation with Rathar (p. 87).
Julia, nominally a slave, is included, protected, and valued in Wulfric’s family, the Visigoth community, in a way she has never been included, protected, and valued in her own Roman family or community.
At the novel’s end, Julia can choose between staying a part of her family of origin and making her permanent home in Rome, or rejoining Wulfric and her new-found Visigoth family. For Julia, the choice is easy.
In Rome, she has known “. . . the things that made life survivable—a proper bathhouse, a proper latrine with running water, civilized food, and someone else to cook it, clean clothes” (p. 29), but she has also known loneliness, felt useless, and been valued and protected only as a pawn or a commodity.
In the Visigoth community, Julia has found “ . . . The beautiful handicrafts, the skills that produced them kept alive despite the dangers and difficulties of a nomadic life. The sophisticated interweaving of family and alliance, kingship and loyalty, the laughing children and the dignified women, having their say, fighting alongside their men” (p. 271).
Here with the Visigoths she has been embraced as a family member and welcomed as a part of a community. Here she has learned meaningful skills and found a purpose for life and work. Here she has been valued and defended, as she has valued and defended others.
So it is no surprise that the book’s end finds Julia moving “into the night, out of Rome, and into a new world” (p 292)--returning with Wulfric, who loves and has sacrificed for her, to the Visigoth community where she has found family, and home, and a sense of belonging.
NOTES: In thinking and writing about this novel I have employed a "hermeneutic of generosity" and found in its exploration of slavery/freedom, involvement/isolation, civilization/barbarianism, honor/betrayal, and purpose/uselessness (among others) much food for thought. It was well written, well researched, and thematically rich.
As much as I enjoyed this novel, however, I acknowledge its limitations. For one thing, the novel's format renders it far too short for its historical era and subject matter, and would have benefited from some additional character history and exposition to fully flesh out Julia's and Wulfric's backstory and make them real characters in my mind. I was disappointed by the ubiquitous bathtub scene, and by Wulfric's convenient "bedroom lie" to Julia (the only time he ever lies to her in the novel, and at such a crucial moment of trust). I was also disappointed in the many, many run-on sentences (perhaps the book should be called "Virgin Slave, Barbarian King, Comma Splice"?) and felt it could have used a good final editing.
The title itself, of course, is the ultimate offense, although I must admit that it has really caught my husband's imagination in a way few romance titles have!
5 Comments:
Melinda, I really enjoyed reading your analysis. I've put up a link to it in the post at Teach Me Tonight which lists all the other responses to Allen's novel.
Oh, thank God, I thought I was the only one completely bothered by all the comma splices. The red pen in my brain was going mad!
Melinda, a really interesting analysis--the only one of the ones I've read so far that makes me consider actually buying the book.
Nah.
I'm not sure the view presented here of Julia's family is necessarily typical of Roman family life, even patrician family life. On the other hand, it's probably typical of many if not most families in which the children are raised by servants or slaves, especially if they are girl children. (I always remember the line from Chesterton's autobiogaphy: "The English, who pride themselves on their family life, send their children to boarding schools and their servants to Coventry."
As I've mentioned before on TMT, Northrop Frye's theory of romance involves the hero and heroine coming together as the nucleus of a new, healthier society; and it sounds like this book is an exemplar of the theory.
Thank you all for reading and making comments! I feel honored to be part of the larger discussion in the blogosphere!
Talpianna, had this been an academic paper, I think the VS,BK analysis would have been just a prologue to the real question, which is the one you posed: is Allen's depiction of Roman family life vs. Goth family life an accurate one? Or, probably more likely, is this depiction reflective of Allen's own view of the process/purpose of a "functional" family? Or perhaps this is a meditation/exploration of the pitfalls and problems attending contemporary family life and a musing on ways to make it more functional/meaningful.
What an interesting "discussion" about this novel. I haven't read it, but I love all the dichotomies you mention. It's very thought provoking.
Post a Comment
<< Home